First Inhabitants of the New World More Closely Resembled the Japanese Than Other Asians

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Further fuel for the fiery debate over the origins of the initial inhabitants of the New World appears in this week¿s issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. C. Loring Brace of the University of Michigan¿s Museum of Anthropology and his colleagues analyzed data from prehistoric and recent human skulls from around the globe in an attempt to track early man's movements into the New World.

The researchers analyzed previously collected data on 1,988 human skulls from Europe, Asia and the Americas. Using 21 detailed measurements taken for each skull, the scientists compared both prehistoric and recent samples, and looked for similarities between various geographically separate groups.

They concluded that the earliest people inhabiting the Western Hemisphere¿dating from 15,000 years ago¿resembled the population of modern and prehistoric Japan more than other, mainland Asian populations. Later arrivals to the New World, such as the Inuits and the Na-Dene-speaking people of the American Southwest, however, share more skull and facial traits with inland populations of Mongolian, Chinese and Southeast Asian descent, the researchers found.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The rise of agriculture, the scientists speculate, stimulated the major expansion of mainland East Asian populations into a variety of locales, including the New World. Because the areas were already occupied, the researchers write, the "consequence was a much greater rate of genetic exchange than had been true for any of the earlier movements."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe