'First Light' Findings Reveal Seeds of Galaxy Clusters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Billions of years ago the universe burst into existence in a violent event scientists have dubbed the Big Bang. Theorists posit that the universe has been expanding ever since, cooling enough along the way to provide suitable conditions for the formation of bodies such as galaxies, galaxy clusters, stars and planets. Although the expansion is now a well-established fact, exactly how those bodies formed remains a mystery. Now, however, researchers working in the Chilean desert with a radio telescope known as the Cosmic Background Imager have captured the first light emitted from the nascent universe (see image), showing the first kernels of galaxy clusters. The findings offer new support to inflation theory.

Until the age of about 300,000 years, the young universe consisted of no more than a cloud of photons tightly coupled with ionized precursors of matter. This was a "dark" time--no light could escape the burgeoning universe since all the photons were trapped and scattered within the plasma of ionized matter. As the universe cooled, however, conditions finally began to allow stable atoms to form, releasing the photons from matter¿s grip and creating the beginnings of what researchers have termed the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). The CMB is a uniform fabric of radiation that covers the entire universe at a constant temperature of 2.7 kelvins. The cooled remnants of the Big Bang, it presents a snapshot of the universe as matter first began to form and release light. Studying the CMB is the best way for researchers to understand the beginnings of the universe and the origins of matter. Subtle variations in the CMB¿s temperature have long been thought to represent the origins of galaxies, but until now, the variations that cosmologists actually saw were much too large to pertain directly to galaxies or galaxy clusters. The structures detected by the Cosmic Background Imager are about 10 15 times the mass of the sun¿large by human standards, but the smallest ones yet seen in the CMB.

"We have seen, for the first time, the seeds that give rise to clusters of galaxies, thus putting theories of galaxy formation on firm observational footing," says team leader Anthony Readhead of California Institute of Technology. "This is basic research at its finest and most exciting," adds NSF director Rita Colwell. "Each new image of the early universe refines our model of how it all began. Just as the universe grows and spreads, humankind¿s knowledge of our own origins continues to expand."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe