Fish Eggs Survive Journey through a Duck

New research suggests one way fish might spread to distant waters

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For centuries scientists speculated that fish eggs reached isolated lakes and ponds by hitching rides on water birds' feathers or feet. But according to findings published in July in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, the mode of transport for at least some eggs could be much more intimate: the new research provides the first evidence that soft-membraned fish eggs, eaten and pooped out by birds, can still hatch into viable young.

“No one ever really thought of bird guts before because I think it's quite an absurd thing,” says co-author Orsolya Vincze, an ecologist at the Danube Research Institute in Debrecen, Hungary. “We were hopeful we'd find something, but we still thought it was pretty unlikely.” Researchers did hatch a killifish egg from swan excrement in 2019—but killifish eggs are unusually hardy, able to withstand extended periods of dehydration.

Vincze and her colleagues hypothesized that ordinary fish eggs might be able to survive being eaten after the study's first author, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, observed that soft plant material stayed alive in bird feces.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To test their hunch, the researchers acquired eight captive-bred mallard ducks from a local breeder and the eggs of two carp species from an aquaculture institute. They force-fed each duck three grams of fertilized eggs (about 500 eggs per serving) from each fish species over two separate experiments. Examination of the birds' feces revealed 18 whole eggs, which the investigators placed in an aquarium. Twelve had viable living embryos, and three hatched into normal baby fish.

“For me, this research shows that there are scientific questions that can yield insightful results, while being implemented within simple, easy-to-understand and [easy-to-]reproduce experimental setups,” says Tibor Hartel, an ecologist at Babeş-Bolyai University in Romania, who was not involved in the study.

Vincze and her colleagues suspect the success rate would be higher in the wild, where conditions are more favorable for keeping eggs healthy; they hope to test this idea in future experiments. They also plan to conduct follow-up studies on a more diverse set of fish species.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe