New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fish Study Finds That Male Mate Choice Matters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Biologists generally agree that female choosiness drives the males of their species to ever-greater heights of showmanship, from having brighter feathers and more sprawling antlers to driving faster cars. Now, in a striking validation of the cosmetics and fashion industries, Trond Amundsen and Elisabet Forsgren at Sweden¿s Goteborg University demonstrate, at least in fish, that male choice matters too.

Amundsen and Forsgren, who published their results in yesterday¿s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that male two-spotted gobies stuck in a partitioned tank between two contrasting females¿one with a bright yellow-orange belly, the other drab¿spent twice as much time in the side of their chamber next to the flashier female, even if the color was markered on. They were also four times more likely to display their willingness to mate¿by shivering up close to the female or undulating toward the nest¿for the more brightly colored female fish. These results, the authors write, "suggest that the colorful belly of female two-spotted gobies has evolved, at least partly, as a response to male mate choice."

But male gobies aren't just interested in beauty. A female's color, which comes from carotenoids in her eggs and to a lesser extent her skin, may indicate to the male the quality of her eggs, the authors note. Males gobies are far outnumbered by females at the end of the mating season and nurture the eggs by themselves, so they have a strong incentive to recoup their investment by choosing a mate who produces eggs more likely to survive.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors point out that mate choice on the part of male animals is relatively widespread. For that reason, they write, "we suggest that more attention be directed at the largely unstudied phenomenon of female 'beauty' in fish and other animals."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe