Fish Study Finds That Male Mate Choice Matters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Biologists generally agree that female choosiness drives the males of their species to ever-greater heights of showmanship, from having brighter feathers and more sprawling antlers to driving faster cars. Now, in a striking validation of the cosmetics and fashion industries, Trond Amundsen and Elisabet Forsgren at Sweden¿s Goteborg University demonstrate, at least in fish, that male choice matters too.

Amundsen and Forsgren, who published their results in yesterday¿s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that male two-spotted gobies stuck in a partitioned tank between two contrasting females¿one with a bright yellow-orange belly, the other drab¿spent twice as much time in the side of their chamber next to the flashier female, even if the color was markered on. They were also four times more likely to display their willingness to mate¿by shivering up close to the female or undulating toward the nest¿for the more brightly colored female fish. These results, the authors write, "suggest that the colorful belly of female two-spotted gobies has evolved, at least partly, as a response to male mate choice."

But male gobies aren't just interested in beauty. A female's color, which comes from carotenoids in her eggs and to a lesser extent her skin, may indicate to the male the quality of her eggs, the authors note. Males gobies are far outnumbered by females at the end of the mating season and nurture the eggs by themselves, so they have a strong incentive to recoup their investment by choosing a mate who produces eggs more likely to survive.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors point out that mate choice on the part of male animals is relatively widespread. For that reason, they write, "we suggest that more attention be directed at the largely unstudied phenomenon of female 'beauty' in fish and other animals."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe