New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fish Uses "Water Tongue" to Grab Prey on Land

The mudskipper's feeding system offers an explanation for how early land animals adapted to their new environment

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Amphibious fish that feed on land use water held in their mouths to help them grab and manipulate their prey. The unusual feeding behavior of mudskippers (Periophthalmus barbarus), captured in high-speed and X-ray video by biologist Krijn Michel and his colleagues at the University of Antwerp, could shed light on the evolution of sea-dwelling animals into terrestrial ones.

Michel's colleagues showed in 2006 that eel catfish (Channallabes apus) can successfully feed on land. But although much research has looked at the changes that allowed the first land animals to move around out of water, less is known about how these animals were able to eat once they made it to land.

In water, fish can use ‘suction feeding’ — gulping in water to draw prey into their mouths. But on land, manipulating food near your mouth without a tongue is a trickier proposition.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To get around this problem, mudskippers come onto land with water in their mouths. The team’s videos show that as the fish approaches its prey — in the experiments, a piece of prawn on a Plexiglass plate — this water starts to protrude from the mouth. As the mudskipper's jaws envelop the target, the fish uses its water to manipulate the food.

“First it spews out the water, then very rapidly… it’s sucking the water back up again. They’re using the water that is in their mouth as a substitute for a tongue,” says Michel. The results were published on March 18 in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

The mudskipper moves various bones to produce its on-land suction — and these facial contortions are different from those used by suction-feeding fish in water. But they are similar to the way newts manipulate prey, Michel says. So it is possible that a similar use of water to manipulate food was an early stage in the evolution of feeding on land.

Having what the researchers call a “hydrodynamic tongue” means that mudskippers can swallow their prey on land, unlike some other species that must return to the water to swallow what they capture ashore. But the mudskippers are not as effective at feeding themselves in water.

“They’re very good at feeding on land. We put the food there and within a fraction of a second it’s gone,” says Michel. “They’re remarkably bad at feeding underwater. They miss the food completely sometimes.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on March 18, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe