Flaws in Placenta May Be Early Sign of Autism

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The earliest indicator yet of autism may be the presence of flawed cells in the placenta, scientists have discovered. The findings could lead to earlier diagnosis of the developmental disorder that affects approximately one in every 200 children and can result in learning difficulties, speech problems and difficulty relating to people.

"The earlier we diagnose it, the more we'll understand the disease and the better and more potent our interventions may be," says research scientist Harvey Kliman of the Yale School of Medicine. Kliman and his team report their finding in the June 26 online issue of Biological Psychiatry.

The research builds on Kliman's previous work, which described abnormal, microscopic pits in the skin of the placenta. In the past, these abnormalities have been linked with a long list of genetic defects, including Down's syndrome and Turner's syndrome.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kliman suspected that they may also be linked to autism. So in this study, he and other researchers at Yale used a microscope to examine tissue samples acquired from placenta saved by various research hospitals. Thirteen of the samples came from children later diagnosed with a form of autism; 61 samples came from children who were not diagnosed with the disease. When Kliman compared the two different kinds of tissue, he found that the placentas from the autistic children were three times more likely to have the abnormal microscopic pits.

Kliman thinks that the research could lead to routine analyses of placenta from at-risk newborns, particularly those with an older brother or sister with autism. Not every autistic child may be linked to the abnormal features on the placenta. But, says Kliman, "If you do see this feature, it's unlikely that the child is completely normal."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe