Floral Derangement

Some of these vegetables are minerals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The late Harvard University paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould said that every species designation represents a theory about that organism—the species assignment is more than a mere naming; it is a classification of the organism within the context of all the other creeping, crawling, clinging and cavorting life on earth. As such, the discovery of a charismatic new species of animal or plant often piques the interest of both the scientific community and the lay public. Finding an entirely new genus is even more exciting. So it is somewhat shocking that a peer-reviewed publication announcing the discovery of a previously uncharacterized family of plants—an even higher taxonomic level than genus—has gone virtually unnoticed.

The shock intensifies when one considers the incredible ubiquity and great economic importance of this plant family, species of which are probably adorning your home, softening the ambience of your dentist’s waiting room or being plodded on by the rambling behemoths of your local football team.

Fortunately I received a copy of the manuscript describing the plant family in question from one Nat Bletter, the lead author of the paper, which appeared online recently—April 1, oddly enough—in the journal Ethnobotany Research and Applications. The journal article’s title says it all, albeit obtusely: “Artificae Plantae: The Taxonomy, Ecology, and Ethnobotany of the Simulacraceae.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As the authors note, the family Simulacraceae represents more than a “technical curiosity”: it is “a genuine scientific conundrum.” Individuals appear to be virtually immortal, they easily form not just interspecies but intergeneric crosses, and they lack any genetic material. (Had Mendel chosen a species from this family for his genetics research, the rules and chemistry of heredity might remain unknown to this day, along with Mendel.) But despite previous disregard by qualified researchers, the plastic peonies, fabric forsythia and wax watermelon wedges of the Simulacraceae live—or, more accurately, exist—among us at every fern. I mean, turn.

Bletter and his co-authors describe 17 different genera of phony flora that include 86 species, samples of which are currently stored at New York City’s Foundation for Artificial Knowledge and Ethnobotany (what’s a four-letter word for “counterfeit”?), which does double duty as a hall closet.

Here is the journal article’s formal description of the new family in Latin, the official language of taxonomic designation. Although the Latin in this case is a bit porcine: “Simulacraceae—away andbray ewnay antplay amilyfay omposedcay ofway objectsway ademay ybay umanshay (How you doing so far, uddybay?) otay ook­lay ikelay anyway eciesspay inway ethay ingdomkay Antaeplay orway ancifulfay eciesspay avinghay omponentscay ofway away ivinglay antplay (I always thought it was antwork and grasshopperplay) eciesspay orway away ombinationcay ofway omponentscay omfray everalsay ivinglay antplay eciesspay utbay otnay ookinglay exactlyway ikelay anway extantway antplay.” Similar swiny Pliny language describes each genus. And the authors note that because there existed absolutely no previously published taxonomic research about this family, “we did not have to coerce any unpaid students to do any literature searches.”

In his spare time, Bletter is a graduate student at the International Plant Science Center at the New York Botanical Garden. He notes that his intensive research on the Simulacraceae stemmed from SCADS—severe chronic avoidance of dissertation syndrome. “We are not sure if SCADS is genetic or environmentally transmitted,” he says, “but perhaps that’s the subject of our next huge NIH-funded project.”

Simulacraceae include the genus Plasticus, fake plants “typically composed primarily of complex polymers of long-chain hydrocarbons, indicative of their origins in the petrochemical industries”; the genus Calciumcarbonatia, faux vegetation designed out of seashells; the genus Paraffinius, familiar examples of which are the dust-covered wax bananas, grapes and apples in the big bowl on Grandma’s kitchen table; and the genus Silicus, which includes the truly world-renowned collection of some 3,000 individual specimens of glass flowers, representing more than 830 real flower species, housed at Harvard’s Museum of Natural History. Now there’s some intelligent design.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky
Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Floral Derangement” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082007-7l9MWZXIPd0n76m3JKlVYY

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe