New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Flu Season Will Likely Peak in February, New Model Suggests

Predictions also suggest this flu season will be mild

sick man in bed

There is still a lot that scientists don't know about predicting flu seasons — factors such as holiday travel and the rate at which people get flu shots could change the predictions.

©iStock

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This flu season will likely peak in February and could be a mild one, according to a new model that aims to forecast the flu in the United States this winter.

The model uses information from past flu seasons, along with a mathematical representation of how influenza spreads through a population and the latest data on the current flu season, to predict how seasonal flu will pan out in the coming months.

According to the new model, there's a less than 1 percent chance that the flu season will peak before January in most of the country, and a less than 20 percent chance that it will peak in January. [6 Flu Vaccine Myths]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On the other hand, there's a 57 percent chance that flu season will peak in February. That would be relatively late — the last three flu seasons have all peaked in December, said Dave Osthus, a researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory who leads the flu forecast project.

The new model also predicts that this flu season will be mild, meaning there will be fewer flu cases than in a typical flu season.

The main reason for this prediction is that "historically, earlier-peaking flu seasons have tended to be more intense... [and] later-peaking seasons tend to be more mild," Osthus told Live Science.

But Osthus cautioned that there is still a lot that scientists don't know about predicting flu seasons — factors such as holiday travel and the rate at which people get flu shots could change the predictions. The researchers plan to update their predictions every two weeks during the 2015-2016 flu season and, at the end of the flu season, assess how well their model did, Osthus said.

The researchers will also continue to tweak their model to improve the predictions. For example, they plan to update the model to take into account how well the flu shot matches the strains of flu in circulation. The model will also incorporate Wikipedia searches for flu, which has been shown in previous research to help predict flu outbreaks.

Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious-disease specialist and a senior associate at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Center for Health Security, who was not involved with the study, said that predictions for flu season can help people plan for the coming season. For example, a later start to flu season means there is more time for people to get vaccinated before flu activity picks up.

"A prediction [of a late flu season] could sway somebody that's been delaying" vaccination, Adalja said.

However, Adalja said that mild flu seasons can still cause a substantial number of illnesses. "Even a mild season of influenza is still a substantial burden," Adalja said. "Every season … kills thousands of Americans."

Osthus agreed. "Even though we're anticipating a milder flu season, we still highly recommend that everyone go and get their flu shot," Osthus said. He also noted that the term "mild season" refers to how many people get sick with the illness, and not how severe the flu will be for an individual person.

Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe