Flubbed Folding Can Make Proteins Lethal

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Diseases ranging from Alzheimer's to type II diabetes may arise from the same molecular mistake: a misfolding of proteins, which then gang up and wreak havoc in cells. Eliminating these aggregates, scientists say, could potentially halt or undo the damage inflicted by these diseases.

In a study published today in the journal Nature, Christopher Dobson of the University of Cambridge and colleagues report that even normally harmless proteins, when coaxed into misfolding and clumping together, kill cells in culture. The inherent toxicity of these aggregates, they say, puts paid to the idea that avoidence of such protein clumping "is crucial for the preservation of biological function." Furthermore, the investigators note, it suggests that degenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's and Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease--so-called protein deposition diseases--have this aggregation feature in common.

A second study detailed in the same issue, conducted by Harvard University researcher Dennis Selkoe and colleagues, found that small aggregates, or oligomers, of amyloid beta protein (which in Alzheimer's patients accumulates in large clumps) impaired synapse function when injected into rat brains. Reducing the levels of potentially dangerous amyloid beta oligomers may therefore represent an attractive approach to treating Alzheimer's, the authors conclude. To that end, they have already identified two chemical compounds that inhibit oligomer formation. But they add that antiaggregation compounds would have to also reduce monomer concentrations, so as to head off initial clumping.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe