New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Fluctuating Rainfall Could Hurt Grazing Regions

Greater swings in dry and wet spells makes grass growth difficult, a challenge for pasturelands around the world

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nearly half of the world's pastureland is experiencing notable changes in precipitation, driving up the risk to grazing and herding communities around the world, according to data collected by a team of U.S., Australian and Brazilian scholars.

The research, led by the University of Minnesota's Institute on the Environment and published in the journal Nature Climate Change, relied on climate data from 1901 to 2014 to create global maps of precipitation variability trends across the world's primary grazing regions.

While some grazing regions showed decreases in water variability, the dominant trend is increased fluctuations in precipitation, the research shows.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Globally, grazing lands experienced about a 25 percent increase in year-to-year precipitation variation compared with the average global land surface area, with 49 percent of pasture area seeing more variability while 31 percent saw less variability.

Such findings could have substantial implications for the roughly 800 million people around the world who depend on grazing livestock for their livelihoods and for food security.

"In a good season, grasses and other plants flourish, supporting robust herds," the researchers said. "In a bad season, the system suffers—as do the people who rely on it. The difference between a good and bad year? One significant and increasingly volatile factor is precipitation."

Lindsey Sloat, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral research associate with the Global Landscapes Initiative at the University of Minnesota, said the research effort "allows us to identify grazing lands that have undergone large changes—and to learn from those places where people have managed to adapt well despite increased variability."

Paul West, co-director of the Minnesota research group, said the findings are especially important because many of the world's grazing lands are considered marginal, meaning they are unsuitable for growing crops because they're either too dry or have poor soils.

"Even small changes in rainfall put them at more risk," West said. Moreover, greater precipitation variability poses the most consequence to marginal lands. Those lands tend to be held by small farmers and pastoralists who depend on livestock for income and sustenance.

Study co-author Mario Herrero of Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation said the research reinforces the idea that "grazing is potentially highly vulnerable to climate change, right across the world, from Australia to Central Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and the Americas."

Globally, some of the greatest increases in variability have been seen in Central Asia, northern Australia, the Sahel region of Africa and portions of South America. In the United States, precipitation variability has increased in the Intermountain West and Baja California, while variability has decreased in the Great Plains.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Daniel Cusick covers climate change adaptation and resilience. He joined E&E News in 2003 and has filed news stories from South Florida to Northern Minnesota. He has reported from more than a half dozen hurricane recovery zones and documented climate change impacts, resilience and energy transitions in East Africa. He lives in Minneapolis.

More by Daniel Cusick

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe