Fluctuating Rainfall Could Hurt Grazing Regions

Greater swings in dry and wet spells makes grass growth difficult, a challenge for pasturelands around the world

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nearly half of the world's pastureland is experiencing notable changes in precipitation, driving up the risk to grazing and herding communities around the world, according to data collected by a team of U.S., Australian and Brazilian scholars.

The research, led by the University of Minnesota's Institute on the Environment and published in the journal Nature Climate Change, relied on climate data from 1901 to 2014 to create global maps of precipitation variability trends across the world's primary grazing regions.

While some grazing regions showed decreases in water variability, the dominant trend is increased fluctuations in precipitation, the research shows.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Globally, grazing lands experienced about a 25 percent increase in year-to-year precipitation variation compared with the average global land surface area, with 49 percent of pasture area seeing more variability while 31 percent saw less variability.

Such findings could have substantial implications for the roughly 800 million people around the world who depend on grazing livestock for their livelihoods and for food security.

"In a good season, grasses and other plants flourish, supporting robust herds," the researchers said. "In a bad season, the system suffers—as do the people who rely on it. The difference between a good and bad year? One significant and increasingly volatile factor is precipitation."

Lindsey Sloat, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral research associate with the Global Landscapes Initiative at the University of Minnesota, said the research effort "allows us to identify grazing lands that have undergone large changes—and to learn from those places where people have managed to adapt well despite increased variability."

Paul West, co-director of the Minnesota research group, said the findings are especially important because many of the world's grazing lands are considered marginal, meaning they are unsuitable for growing crops because they're either too dry or have poor soils.

"Even small changes in rainfall put them at more risk," West said. Moreover, greater precipitation variability poses the most consequence to marginal lands. Those lands tend to be held by small farmers and pastoralists who depend on livestock for income and sustenance.

Study co-author Mario Herrero of Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation said the research reinforces the idea that "grazing is potentially highly vulnerable to climate change, right across the world, from Australia to Central Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and the Americas."

Globally, some of the greatest increases in variability have been seen in Central Asia, northern Australia, the Sahel region of Africa and portions of South America. In the United States, precipitation variability has increased in the Intermountain West and Baja California, while variability has decreased in the Great Plains.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Daniel Cusick covers climate change adaptation and resilience. He joined E&E News in 2003 and has filed news stories from South Florida to Northern Minnesota. He has reported from more than a half dozen hurricane recovery zones and documented climate change impacts, resilience and energy transitions in East Africa. He lives in Minneapolis.

More by Daniel Cusick

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe