New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Fluorescent Feathers Elicit Parrot Amour

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ¿SCIENCE

Fluorescent colors come and go on the fashion runways, but parrots always consider the glow a must-have. Indeed, the results of a new study, published in the current issue of the journal Science,suggest that the birds look for feather fluorescence when choosing their mates.

Fluorescent pigments appear to glow because they absorb and reemit ultraviolet light at longer wavelengths. Such pigments decorate the crown and cheek feathers of budgerigar birds, commonly known as budgies. (In the image at the right, short-wavelength illumination reveals the budgies' fluorescent markings.) But whether the fluorescence serves a specific purpose or is merely a by-product of the birds' brilliant coloring has remained somewhat of a mystery. To answer that question, Kathryn E. Arnold of the University of Glasgow and her colleagues devised a clever experiment. They gave budgies of both sexes their choice of two birds of the opposite sex, one of which retained its fluorescent plumage and the other of which had its glow snuffed with sunblock. Both males and females, the researchers found, showed a strong sexual preference for the fluorescent birds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team also considered the bird's visual apparatus and determined that the fluorescent yellow feathers are ideally placed for chromatic detection by another lovelorn budgie. "These findings show that the fluorescent plumage of parrots is an adapted sexual signal, rather than a by-product of plumage pigmentation," the investigators conclude. "Given the elaborate biochemical pathway by which fluorescent pigments are produced, they may be costly and thereby honest indicators of individual quality."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe