Following the Data Trail from Humble Human Beginnings to World Domination

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the November 2013 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometime around two million years ago the number and types of large carnivore species in Africa began to drop. Were our forebears responsible? In our cover story, “Early Humans—Not Climate Change—Decimated Africa’s Large Carnivores,” paleontologist Lars Werdelin takes us down the data trail in search of an answer. Although our ancestors were slow and weak, he posits, they also proved to be clever and collaborative and, as omnivores, able to take advantage of opportunities for obtaining nourishing calories from a variety of different sources better than more dedicated meat eaters could. As a result, when times were the worst, they might have had a competitive advantage.

Millennia later, with humans now firmly in the position of being the dominant species on our blue planet, we are taking the next step in understanding and managing our world through big data. Computers gather and analyze countless bits of our personal information. We leave a trail of our digital DNA with every click: what we buy online, the number and types of searches we make, and even where we go and when with our smartphones. Through the use of powerful algorithms that sift through the masses of recorded activities, we are making the world a more efficient, healthier and better-managed place to be sure. But, asks digital visionary Jaron Lanier, at what cost?

As Lanier explores in “How to Think about Privacy,” privacy is more than an expectation of remaining at least a little mysterious to others. It is a lens through which we can explore our fast-changing notions surrounding its relation to power, politics and the law. Technology, he reminds us, is ultimately society's to wield as we collectively see fit.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We still have the potential to choose what we want,” Lanier writes. “It is as if we have forgotten the most basic fact about computers: they are programmable.”

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Following Data Trails” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1113-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe