New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Following the Data Trail from Humble Human Beginnings to World Domination

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the November 2013 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometime around two million years ago the number and types of large carnivore species in Africa began to drop. Were our forebears responsible? In our cover story, “Early Humans—Not Climate Change—Decimated Africa’s Large Carnivores,” paleontologist Lars Werdelin takes us down the data trail in search of an answer. Although our ancestors were slow and weak, he posits, they also proved to be clever and collaborative and, as omnivores, able to take advantage of opportunities for obtaining nourishing calories from a variety of different sources better than more dedicated meat eaters could. As a result, when times were the worst, they might have had a competitive advantage.

Millennia later, with humans now firmly in the position of being the dominant species on our blue planet, we are taking the next step in understanding and managing our world through big data. Computers gather and analyze countless bits of our personal information. We leave a trail of our digital DNA with every click: what we buy online, the number and types of searches we make, and even where we go and when with our smartphones. Through the use of powerful algorithms that sift through the masses of recorded activities, we are making the world a more efficient, healthier and better-managed place to be sure. But, asks digital visionary Jaron Lanier, at what cost?

As Lanier explores in “How to Think about Privacy,” privacy is more than an expectation of remaining at least a little mysterious to others. It is a lens through which we can explore our fast-changing notions surrounding its relation to power, politics and the law. Technology, he reminds us, is ultimately society's to wield as we collectively see fit.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We still have the potential to choose what we want,” Lanier writes. “It is as if we have forgotten the most basic fact about computers: they are programmable.”

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Following Data Trails” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1113-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe