Food for Symbolic Thought

Besides the first seafood dinner, signs of the earliest symbolic thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A cave on the southern coast of South Africa contains a bowl’s worth of edible shellfish dating back to about 165,000 years ago. Besides pushing back the earliest known seafood meal by 40,000 years, the discovery also marks the earliest time when people might have engaged in symbolic thought.

Anatomically modern humans probably emerged between 150,000 and 200,000 years ago in eastern Africa. When those humans first developed the potential for symbolic thought, including language, has remained a puzzle.

Looking for early human remains, Curtis W. Marean of the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University and his colleagues homed in on the caves at South Africa’s Pinnacle Point. In addition to discovering the first known seafood dinner—mostly brown mussels—they found small stone blades and reddish rocks tossed in with the shells. They identified a dozen or so pieces of iron-rich hematite rock with flattened sides bearing parallel grooves, indicating that the shellfish eaters scraped the rocks to make powder. Mixing that powder with sap or another binder yields a reddish or pinkish paint, possibly to adorn the body or the face.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That people were working with pigments back then “is a pretty good indicator of symbolic thought,” says Marean, who published the findings in the October 18 Nature. A population living on shellfish would have stayed in one place and grown in number, he notes, increasing the need for negotiations between individuals or social groups, which might have led to a system of decorative markings.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe