New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

How Much Momentum Does It Take to Stop a Running Back?

From a physics perspective, football is all about overcoming inertia

Philadelphia Eagles running back Jay Ajayi (36) runs with the football during the NFC Championship Game between the Minnesota Vikings and the Philadelphia Eagles on January 21, 2018 at the Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

NBC Learn's "The Science of NFL Football" episode about Newton's first law of motion explains that, like an offensive line set on the line of scrimmage before the ball is hiked, a body at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an outside force. Likewise, a body—whether it's a wide receiver streaking downfield to make a catch or a running back charging into the end zone—moving at constant speed and direction will remain in motion unless acted on by an unbalanced force, in most cases a defensive player moving in the opposite direction.

The first law of motion is not a law so much as a scientific generalization based on the study of physical forces (such as gravity) pulling or pushing on an object and its motion due to those forces. It is one of three laws of motion put forth by English scientist and philosopher Sir Isaac Newton more than 300 years ago.

A big part of Newton's first law is inertia, which would be the natural resistance a player at rest experiences as he sets himself in motion, and for a player in motion, to stop moving. A running back is at rest while he waits for the center to snap the ball to the quarterback. Once the play begins, the back pumps his legs to overcome static inertia, takes the handoff, and then tries to maintain moving inertia until a defenseman tackles him, restoring static inertia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The bigger and heavier a player is, the more mass he has and the greater the force that's required to break his inertia. This is why a 200-pound running back will look to make quick cuts to the left or right to evade a 250-pound tackler—the running back has less mass and can more easily change direction than his more massive opponent. On the other side of the ball, that more massive tackler looks to use his greater mass to generate enough force to stop his opponent's forward inertia.

All of that mass in motion creates momentum, or what Newton called the "quantity of motion," says Tim Gay, a physics professor at the University of Nebraska in Lincoln and author of "The Physics of Football." To illustrate momentum, Gay points to a 215-pound defensive player running at about 33 feet per second toward a running back who has just received a handoff. Under those circumstances the defender would have three times the momentum of the relatively stationary running back and hit him with roughly two thirds of a ton of force.

Defenders running full speed, however, face a risk: the ball carrier could sidestep an overly aggressive player. In that case, as Newton's first law dictates, the defender would have a hard time changing his inertia—that is, stopping and shifting direction. And rather than trying to zero out a ball carrier's momentum with at least an equivalent momentum, for most players, it's more practical to knock the running back off balance so that gravity can do some of the work.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe