For Low-Emission Planes, Try Superconductivity

Researchers propose electric jet engines powered by superconducting magnets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Building jet engines out of superconducting materials may offer a way to lower aircraft emissions in the long run. Researchers have determined that superconducting turbines would be lightweight and powerful enough to run on electricity from clean-burning hydrogen fuel cells or generators that consume relatively small amounts of fossil fuel.

Although such technology would be costly to develop, "it will become a viable option, I'm pretty confident," says electromechanical engineer Philippe Masson of Florida A&M University and Florida State University, both in Tallahassee.

Aircraft account for a growing proportion of global greenhouse emissions, including about 3 percent of the U.S. total as of 2003. Jet engines ignite a mixture of air and jet fuel, which spins a turbine that creates thrust. More efficient gas turbines might burn 10 to 15 percent less fuel, Masson says, but not enough to make them greenhouse gas–free.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


NASA and the Department of Defense funded Masson and colleagues to design an electric jet engine, which would use opposing magnets to spin a turbine. Engines based on conventional magnets would have to be several times heavier than current gas turbines, as well as less fuel efficient, to achieve the same power, Masson says.

A superconducting magnet, however, would be much more efficient and powerful for its size. When chilled to 77 kelvins (–321 degrees Fahrenheit) or colder, so-called high-temperature superconductors such as the ceramic YBCO (yttrium barium copper oxide) begin to carry electricity without resistance, which produces a strong magnetic field without wasting energy.

Liquid hydrogen (20 K, or –424 degrees F) could chill the superconductor as well as power a hydrogen fuel cell to send electricity through it, he and co-workers report in the journal Superconductor Science and Technology. Masson says that based on their designs, a YBCO turbine would generate as much power as a single-engine Cessna aircraft for roughly half of the mass. A commercial aircraft might require a fossil-fueled electrical generator to magnetize the superconductor, he says.

Creating a superconducting jet engine would require improvements in fuel cells and other electronics, and the price tag alone—$1 million to $2 million for a prototype—may keep superconducting turbines grounded for some time, Masson says. "The market is so small nobody wants to invest."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe