For Remote-Control Cells, Just Add Magnets

Magnetic particles turn cell signals on and off

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new study suggests that to meld living cells with the digital world, think of them as you would a refrigerator door—a handy place to stick magnets.

Researchers report in Nature Nanotechnology that they triggered immune system cells to begin a biochemical process that produces histamine (the chemical responsible for allergic responses) by dusting them with iron particles and applying a magnetic field.

They say the technique could lead to lighter weight, lower power biosensors for detecting pathogens, or novel ways of delivering drugs to specific parts of the body—if not the healing powers sometimes attributed to magnetism. "The idea was, could you actually have an interface with living cells that would be analogous to a machine interface or a computer interface," says cell biologist Donald Ingber of Harvard Medical School and Children's Hospital Boston.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cells are studded with a variety of receptor proteins that activate when certain molecules latch onto them, triggering a cascade of biochemical events inside the cells that result in actions such as the secretion of hormones or destruction of pathogens.

In order to send such a signal, receptors often must also knock into one another. Ingber and his colleagues sought to magnetically induce this jostling by coating particles of iron oxide with dinitrophenyl (DNP) molecules that attach to the receptors on histamine-producing mast cells.

The 30-nanometer-wide iron oxide beads (about the size of a virus) were superparamagnetic, or capable of repeatedly becoming magnetic in the presence of a true magnet. When magnetized, the beads would attract one another, forcing the receptors to huddle and activate.

The researchers report that when they switched on an electromagnet near the coated cells, there was a spike in the calcium levels inside them, which is the first step in the histamine secretion process. The spike ended when they switched off the magnet. The results demonstrate "unprecedented control" over individual cell receptors using an electromagnetic field, University of Pennsylvania bioengineer Christopher Chen wrote in an editorial accompanying the study.

Ingber envisions one day using a similar trick to create pacemaker-like systems for regulating insulin levels in the blood or to deliver antidotes to soldiers exposed to chemical or biological weapons. But first, he notes, researchers will have to see if they can apply the process to other cells and get the desired effects.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe