Forest Boosts Nearby Coffee Plantation's Profits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Conservationists often argue in favor of preserving tropical forests to maintain biodiversity. Now they can appeal to people's wallets, too. New research suggests that saving tropical forests that are close to coffee crops can lead to increased yields and correspondingly higher profits.

Taylor Ricketts of Stanford University and his colleagues studied a coffee plantation in Costa Rica that is located near a tropical forest. The team assessed the health of plants in three different sections: within 100 meters of the forest, between 700 and 800 meters from the forest, and between 1400 and 1600 meters away from the trees. In a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists report that the coffee plants closest to the forest fared best. Higher rates of pollination by bees that live in the forest led to a 20 percent increase in coffee yields in the two nearest plots. In addition, the plants closer to the tropical forest had 27 percent fewer peaberries, or misshapen seeds, which resulted in higher quality coffee.

Using market prices of coffee, the researchers estimated the economic impact of the improved crops. For the one farm that they studied, the researchers calculated that the forest contributed roughly $60,000 a year between 2000 and 2003, or 7 percent of the plantation's total income. ¿Policies that allow landowners to capture the value of pollination and other services," they conclude, "could provide powerful incentives for forest conservation in some of the most biodiverse and threatened regions on Earth.¿

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe