New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Forest Boosts Nearby Coffee Plantation's Profits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Conservationists often argue in favor of preserving tropical forests to maintain biodiversity. Now they can appeal to people's wallets, too. New research suggests that saving tropical forests that are close to coffee crops can lead to increased yields and correspondingly higher profits.

Taylor Ricketts of Stanford University and his colleagues studied a coffee plantation in Costa Rica that is located near a tropical forest. The team assessed the health of plants in three different sections: within 100 meters of the forest, between 700 and 800 meters from the forest, and between 1400 and 1600 meters away from the trees. In a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the scientists report that the coffee plants closest to the forest fared best. Higher rates of pollination by bees that live in the forest led to a 20 percent increase in coffee yields in the two nearest plots. In addition, the plants closer to the tropical forest had 27 percent fewer peaberries, or misshapen seeds, which resulted in higher quality coffee.

Using market prices of coffee, the researchers estimated the economic impact of the improved crops. For the one farm that they studied, the researchers calculated that the forest contributed roughly $60,000 a year between 2000 and 2003, or 7 percent of the plantation's total income. ¿Policies that allow landowners to capture the value of pollination and other services," they conclude, "could provide powerful incentives for forest conservation in some of the most biodiverse and threatened regions on Earth.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe