New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Forgetting to Remember

Forgetting is a vital brain function

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Lucy? Jane? Melissa? The next time someone's name stays frustratingly on the tip of your tongue, don't feel bad—your brain is just doing its job. Forgetting not only helps the brain conserve energy, it also improves our short-term memory and recall of important details, according to two recent studies.

Stanford University scientists asked students to study 240 word pairs and then instructed them to memorize only a small subset of the list, requiring the students to selectively retain some pairs and mentally discard others. Then the researchers performed MRI scans on the participants while testing them to see how well they had learned all the pairs. Those who could most often summon the target pairs were also the worst at remembering the others, suggesting that they were better at unconsciously filtering out unwanted memories. In addition, these subjects' MRI scans showed reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex, an area associated with detecting and resolving memory conflicts.

“When we want to remember things that are relevant, we put in much less neural effort if we have forgotten the things that are irrelevant,” says psychologist Anthony Wagner, a co-author of the paper. The findings suggest that memory suppression helps to conserve energy and improve efficiency—and some research indicates that efficient brains think faster.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A second study reveals that working memory, a form of short-term memory that both passively stores and actively manipulates information, benefits from an inhibition of long-term memory. Researchers investigating mice used x-rays or genetic techniques to stop the formation of new neurons in the hippocampus, which is important for long-term memory. These mice performed maze-related working-memory tasks better than normal mice did, suggesting “that by impairing one form of memory, long-term memory, it is actually possible to improve another form,” says Gaël Malleret, a neuroscientist at Columbia University and co-author of the study. So if you accidentally call Lucy “Melissa,” take heart—your brain probably just chose to dump her name in favor of a more crucial fact, such as where you left your keys.

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Forgetting to Remember” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 5 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1007-13a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe