Fossil Flora Suggest Rain Forest Once Flourished Where Colorado Now Burns

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some 65 million years ago, a mass extinction of global proportions stamped out much of the earth¿s flora and fauna, perhaps most notably the dinosaurs. The fossil record indicates that worldwide species diversity did not recover from this catastrophic event for another 10 million years. It came as a surprise, then, when researchers recently discovered near Denver, Colo., remnants of an incredibly plant-rich rain forest dating to just 1.4 million years after the devastation.

Writing in the current issue of the journal Science, Kirk Johnson and Beth Ellis of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science report that fossilized leaf remains collected from five different sites in the area reveal an assortment of vegetation very similar in form and quantity to that of lush modern-day tropical forests (see artist's reconstruction above). Large leaves with elongated "drip tips," palmlike fronds and the large numbers of new species evidenced by these specimens contrast sharply with what is known from other sites dated to the same period, most of which are species-poor. Johnson and Ellis posit that a so-called rain shadow from nearby mountains may have enabled frequent dousing of the area with water, perhaps from monsoons originating in the Gulf of Mexico or a large sea that once sat in present-day North Dakota. Such nourishing conditions, they propose, would have allowed this forest to flourish while others recovered more slowly.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe