New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fossil Flora Suggest Rain Forest Once Flourished Where Colorado Now Burns

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some 65 million years ago, a mass extinction of global proportions stamped out much of the earth¿s flora and fauna, perhaps most notably the dinosaurs. The fossil record indicates that worldwide species diversity did not recover from this catastrophic event for another 10 million years. It came as a surprise, then, when researchers recently discovered near Denver, Colo., remnants of an incredibly plant-rich rain forest dating to just 1.4 million years after the devastation.

Writing in the current issue of the journal Science, Kirk Johnson and Beth Ellis of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science report that fossilized leaf remains collected from five different sites in the area reveal an assortment of vegetation very similar in form and quantity to that of lush modern-day tropical forests (see artist's reconstruction above). Large leaves with elongated "drip tips," palmlike fronds and the large numbers of new species evidenced by these specimens contrast sharply with what is known from other sites dated to the same period, most of which are species-poor. Johnson and Ellis posit that a so-called rain shadow from nearby mountains may have enabled frequent dousing of the area with water, perhaps from monsoons originating in the Gulf of Mexico or a large sea that once sat in present-day North Dakota. Such nourishing conditions, they propose, would have allowed this forest to flourish while others recovered more slowly.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe