New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fossil Fuel Extraction on Public Lands Produces One Quarter of U.S. Emissions

The finding comes amid a Trump Administration push to increase federal fossil fuel leases and roll back methane regulations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The National Climate Assessment wasn’t the only global warming report the Trump administration quietly released over the Thanksgiving holiday.

The U.S. Geological Survey reported Friday that about one-quarter of all U.S. carbon emissions come from fossil fuels extracted from public lands.

Environmentalists reacted by renewing calls to end leasing for oil, gas and coal leasing on federal tracts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Between 2005 and 2014, an average of 23.7 percent of American carbon dioxide emissions came from energy produced on public lands. That includes the emissions generated by drilling, mining, transporting and refining fuel before it’s burned.

Commissioned in 2016 by the Obama administration, the report found that coal is mostly responsible for those emissions, with coal-fired power plants alone accounting for nearly 60 percent of public lands’ carbon emissions.

In other words, coal mined on public lands accounted for more than 13 percent of U.S. emissions over the past decade.

Public lands are also significant sources of the powerful greenhouse gases methane (7.3 percent of total U.S. emissions) and nitrous oxide (1.5 percent).

David Hayes, who was President Obama’s deputy Interior secretary, wrote on Twitter that the report confirmed mining and drilling public lands is driving serious emissions, yet the Trump administration is promoting policies that will make it worse.

Interior is pushing out large volumes of fossil fuel lease sales while also rolling back regulations on methane, which drives steep warming over the short term. The department has said these moves have put 230,000 more people to work while creating billions of dollars in new wealth (Greenwire, Nov. 14).

Taylor McKinnon of the Center for Biological Diversity said the report shows how important it is to move in the opposite direction.

"One of the first and best ways to respond is to end new fossil-fuel leasing on public lands. That will help reduce threats to the climate, clean air and water, endangered wildlife and wild places. Ending public lands leasing programs must be a pillar of any serious climate plan moving forward," he said in a statement.

It’s not clear how much President Trump’s policies could change emissions.

The report showed emissions peaking around 2009 before decreasing about 6 percent. The Trump administration has overseen a bounce in coal mined on federal lands—but the amount mined in fiscal 2017 was still less than all but one year under Obama, according to Interior data.

Among the report’s other findings:

  • Of 28 states where energy is extracted from public lands, as well as the offshore Gulf of Mexico and Pacific regions, more than half the carbon emissions—57.7 percent—come from Wyoming alone. The Gulf was second, with 19 percent.

  • Public lands sequester about 15 percent of the emissions that originate there.

  • Wildfire caused public lands to lose 67 million metric tons of sequestered carbon over the past decade—nearly a fifth of the total. Most of those losses came from Alaska. By comparison, 43 million metric tons was lost to logging, and 39 million metric tons was lost to other land use changes.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe