New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Fossil Supports Case for Dutiful Dinosaur Parenting

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A fossil find from China provides new support for the idea that dinosaurs were devoted parents. A report published today in the journal Nature describes a specimen that includes the remains of an adult skeleton surrounded by 34 juvenile ones. ¿It's one more piece to further support that parental care occurred among dinosaurs,¿ remarks study co-author David J. Varricchio of the University of Montana.

Varricchio and his colleagues analyzed a two-foot wide specimen of red-grey mudstone collected from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation, an area in Liaoning, China, that is famous for providing well-preserved dinosaur and bird fossils. The remains are of a type of dinosaur known as Psittacosaurus, a plant-eating creature that grew to be about the same size as a midsize dog. The posture of the skeletons--all the creatures were upright with their legs tucked beneath them--suggests that the animals were rapidly entombed while still alive, the authors note. Just how the creatures perished remains unclear, but a collapsing burrow, flooding or a covering of volcanic debris could be to blame.

From the size of the young as well as the density of the bone remains, the researchers infer that the parental care was extensive. Today's archosaurs--crocodilians and birds--are model parents, providing warmth, food and shelter, but whether the traits evolved independently is still unclear. The authors caution that more finds supporting the theory of doting dino dads and moms are required to determine if it's indeed a shared ancestral characteristic.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe