Fossil Teeth Reveal How Modern Humans' Growth Patterns Differ from Other Primates'

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It's often said that teenagers today just can't wait to grow up. But humans' long period of growth and development¿18 years or more¿is one of the things that sets us apart from great apes such as chimpanzees and gorillas, which mature in only 11 or 12 years. Now new research, published in this week's issue of Nature, suggests that our long period of development arose quite late in our evolutionary history.

Image: CHRISTOPHER DEAN/Pennsylvania State University

Christopher Dean of University College, London and colleagues examined 13 fossil tooth fragments from specimens dating between four million and 120, 000 years ago. "Dental development is a good measure of overall growth and development," co-author Alan Walker of Pennsylvania State University explains. "Teeth grow in an incremental manner like trees or shells, preserving a record of their growth with daily marks along the prisms that make up the enamel." By examining patterns (see image) within the enamel of both the fossil and modern teeth, the scientists calculated and compared rates of growth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first dental evidence for a modern human-like growth period, the scientists discovered, was in a Neanderthal fossil from around 120,000 years ago. What's more, the researchers found that Homo erectus, despite its complement of many modern human characteristics such as body proportions, weight and small teeth and jaws, did not exhibit a slow growth period. They suggest this finding may be linked to the fact that, compared to modern humans, Homo erectus still had a small brain, which would not require as much time to grow and learn. "It seems our prolonged period of growth and development may be a more recent evolutionary acquisition that arose in step with our comparatively recent development of a larger, modern, human-sized brain," Walker says.

In an accompanying commentary in the same issue, Jocopo Moggi-Cecchi of the University of Florence writes, "it is becoming increasingly clear that many features thought to be typical of modern humans may have evolved more than once." The present study he adds, "raises new challenges in the search for fossil evidence of those characteristics that define both our genus and our species."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe