New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fossilized Poop Shows How Ancient Dogs Adapted to People

Microbe DNA trapped in 3,500-year-old fossils shows canine adaptation to agricultural diets

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The shift from hunting and gathering to farming altered human evolution—and that of our closest companions, dogs. Coprolites, or fossilized poop, are a “phenomenal” source of information on how diet influenced such changes, says University of Oxford archaeologist Greger Larson. “They’re snapshots of somebody’s gut.” A recent analysis of 13 Bronze Age canine coprolites reveals how shifts to a grain-based diet affected dogs’ gut microbes, which may have played a role in the animals’ domestication.

Researchers sequenced DNA from the 3,600- to 3,450-year-old fossils, which were found at the site of an ancient agricultural community in northeastern Italy. Dog DNA in the coprolites had fewer copies of a gene that encodes amylase, a digestive protein that breaks down starches in the gut, than that of most modern dogs. Many of today’s wolves lack this gene altogether, and scientists typically attribute the divergence to domesticated dogs’ shift from meat-heavy to grain-rich meals.

But along with an animal’s own proteins, gut microbes also aid digestion. When the researchers sequenced microbial remnants in the fossilized feces, they found evidence of bacteria that produce high amounts of amylase. The dogs’ own genomes had not yet fully evolved to handle the grainy diet of their farming domesticators, “so they were complemented by microbes,” says University of Bologna microbiologist Marco Candela, senior author on the study, which was published in iScience.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although these fossilized microbiomes shed light on an intermediate stage between wolves and dogs, domestication was not a simple linear process, says Durham University zooarchaeologist Angela Perri, who was not involved with the study. “It feels neat and clean to say it’s a progression from X to Y to Z,” she says, but consistent interbreeding between wild and domesticated canines complicates things. And even modern dogs carry varying numbers of amylase genes, notes Larson, who also was not on the research team. Still, Perri says it is significant that microbes may have picked up the slack where the dogs’ own genomes fell short. This phenomenon might have also occurred in human guts during our shift from a hunter-gatherer diet to a farming one—a possibility Candela and his colleagues are now examining.

Perri notes that the new research demonstrates how much can be learned from fossilized animal excrement, a historically untapped and underappreciated resource from human settlements. “Usually in archaeology, human material is difficult to get a hold of,” she says. “But no one is fighting over dog poop.”

Tess Joosse was formerly an Editorial Fellow at Scientific American. She earned a master's degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Tess Joosse
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Domesticated Diets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 4 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1021-18b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe