Four Decades of Progress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Perhaps nothing better illustrates the movement toward more and more precise spectra since the advent of x-ray astronomy 40 years ago than looking at the results. The following spectrographs were all taken of a star named Capella, which is 42 light-years away and shines in northern skies.

The first spectrum taken of Capella was made during a rocket flight in 1974, and this spectrograph was published in March 1975.

By the HEAO-1 mission, launched in 1977, spectrographs had advanced considerably, as you'll see in this example.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


HEAO-2, also called "Einstein," was launched in 1978 and was the first imaging x-ray mission--which gave astronomers the ability to "see" what they were measuring. Einstein was also better at separating the background radiation from the actual object than previous instruments.

Today, with Chandra, launched, two years ago, astronomers are able to separate individual emissions "almost" within a line--untangling blended data better than ever before. Here is the total range and one that demonstrates several components (r, i and f) of one emission line--used to derive temperature, density and ionization of gases in and around an object of study. Last, an XMM-Newton spectrograph. --Ilana Harrus


Back to Fine-Tuning Astronomy

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe