New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Four-Eyed 'Daddy Longlegs' Fossil Discovered

A spider-like arachnid fossil helps explain the evolutionary path of modern harvestmen, often called 'daddy longlegs'

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The ancient ancestors of today's harvestmen, the spider-like arachnids sometimes called "daddy longlegs," had not just one, but two sets of eyes, a newfound fossil reveals.

The recent discovery of this harvestman fossil in eastern France may shed light on the evolution of these arachnids, which can be found on every continent except Antarctica, the researchers said.

Using X-ray techniques, the scientists made images of the 305-million-year-old harvestman fossil. It reveals that the two sets of eyes found on the harvestman species Hastocularis argus were separated, with one set located close to the center of the head, and another on the sides of the head. [Images: 4-Eyed Daddy Longlegs Helps Explain Arachnid Evolution]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These ancient arachnids were related to spiders, but were not themselves spiders, the researchers said. "Although they have eight legs, harvestmen are not spiders. They are more closely related to another arachnid, the scorpion," study author Russell Garwood, a paleontologist at the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom, said in a statement.

Today's arachnids, a group of animals that includes not only harvestmen but also spiders and scorpions, can indeed have two sets of eyes, Garwood said. However, modern harvestmen only have one set, located close to the center of the body, he said.

"These findings represent a significant leap in our understanding of the evolution of this group," Garwood said.

The researchers tracked this "lost" set of eyes by examining the genes of modern-day harvestmen embryos, and they found that a remnant of the ancient, additional eye set indeed remains in the modern species' genes.

The skeletons of harvestmen and other organisms that belong to the same group of terrestrial arthropods do not tend to preserve well, making it hard to find their fossils, said study author Prashant Sharma, a postdoctoral researcher at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

"As a result, some fundamental questions in the evolutionary history of these organisms remain unsolved," he said.

The findings are published today (April 10) in the journal Current Biology.

Follow Agata Blaszczak-Boxe on Twitter.FollowLive Science @livescience, Facebook& Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Copyright 2014 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe