Friends With Many Benefits

Managing editor Sandra Upson introduces the January/February 2014 issue of Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“Friendship is certainly the finest balm for the pangs of disappointed love,” Jane Austen writes in her 1817 novel Northanger Abbey. What if one's friend is the source of those pangs? Can he or she still be a friend? Journalist Carlin Flora explores this question in our cover story, "Can Men and Women Be Just Friends?".

Despite massive gains in gender equality, platonic friendship between heterosexual men and women still draws some suspicion. This intuition rests on two related assumptions. First, that physical attraction is inevitable in such a union. Second, that selfishness or subterfuge weakens the bond as a friend angles for more intimacy. As Flora reveals, neither of these conjectures holds up. And should unrequited feelings arise, she offers tips from science to help friends navigate mismatched expectations.

We rely on friends for good conversation—but we also maintain a silent inner dialogue with ourselves. Studies suggest that such self-talk helps us craft the conscious narrative of our lives. Read about our inner dialogue in “Getting to Know the Voices in Your Head,” by Ferris Jabr, an associate editor at Scientific American.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Talking through a task—this time aloud—appears to help children with autism overcome language difficulties, Jabr notes. A new trend in autism therapy targets such deficits at age one or two, when the brain is still highly malleable. See “New Therapies Take Early Aim at Autism,” by journalist Luciana Gravotta.

Early intervention is also the goal in another public health concern, the brain deterioration that multiple hits to the head can trigger. In “How Football Destroys the Brain” neuroscientists Jacqueline C. Tanaka and Gregg B. Wells investigate the rapidly evolving science of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a disorder involving damaged neurons that threatens to reshape the game of football.

If you take one thing away from this issue, let it be this: integrity at the cellular level, the dynamics of our inner universe and the richness of our social world contribute equally to mental well-being. May your brain thrive on all levels.

SA Mind Vol 25 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Controversial Friends” in SA Mind Vol. 25 No. 1 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0114-2

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe