From Genome to Cancer--Why the Time Is Right

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When in 1986 I suggested a new project directed at identifying all human genes, one of my overriding goals was to find those genes involved in cancer development--a feat I hoped would lead to new tools for cancer research and, ultimately, to new therapies. That original human genome project has now been carried out and has demonstrated its usefulness for the discovery of genes involved in many diseases, including cancer. Moreover, the genome sequencing effort has been extended to other organisms--from bacteria to chimpanzees--and is showing the unity of life by revealing how many genes distant species share in common.

In the course of this work, new technologies have also provided a much more detailed understanding of the complicated processes by which genes give rise to a variety of functional molecules. An important outcome of this research is the realization that genes do not act alone but are participants in extensive networks of activity within cells. Any change in the functioning of one gene can therefore be accompanied by changes in the workings of multiple genes and proteins involved in the cells' self-maintenance.

The complexity of this system in normal cells is evident in what we already know about cancer--that it results from the stepwise loss of such cellular self-control, which becomes more and more complete as the disease progresses. That progression is caused only in part by physical alterations, or mutations, in specific genes; mostly it is the result of consequent changes in the activity of many other genes involved in cell regulation. Single genes may therefore be responsible in the initiation of cancer and so potential therapeutic targets. To reach the more advanced stages of these cancers (such as the acute phase of myeloid leukemia or the metastatic phase of other cancers), however, the participation of many other genes is required. Most of them are still unknown.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An exception is the recently observed phenomenon of oncogene addiction in certain tumor cells: despite the presence of numerous mutations to the cellular genome, turning off the activity of one so-called oncogene causes the cells to commit suicide via a mechanism known as apoptosis. But how generally this phenomenon occurs is also unknown. To approach these questions, it will be necessary to have a complete catalogue of the structural and functional alterations of genes and other cellular comp¿onents that cause the loss of regulation in cancer cells. This process, in turn, will require a complete determination of their connections into networks by computational means--a task for the future.

On the way to this goal, however, many other unanswered questions can be explored by the research community. A possible role for stem cells in cancer, for example, is supported by similarities in the behavior of stem cells and cancer cells: both have an unlimited ability to divide; both are very sensitive to the cellular environment, or niche, in which they grow; and many of the genes known to be active in stem cells are also activated in cancer cells.

The advent of genomics has provided welcome insight into the mechanisms by which normal cells become cancerous, but our picture is still incomplete. The time has come to obtain a truly comprehensive catalogue of the genes involved in cancer, bringing to bear all the power of the new tools of genomics and molecular biology to the problem. The Cancer Genome Atlas project aims to do just that.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe