From Science to Knowledge to Hope: New Insights into the Multiverse and to Lou Gehrig's Disease

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“Chained like a dog.” He gestured at the block letters he had scrawled on a yellow legal pad and then at the ventilator connection on his throat. Gregarious and charming, my father had prized autonomy above all else. A self-made man, as he called himself, he ran his own business; enjoyed “playing” with his “machines” (motorcycle, motorboat, sports car, minivan), which he fixed himself; and raised three daughters alone after our mother died when I was 12. He taught my two younger sisters and me to “learn something new every day” and advised us to get university degrees: “You can do anything you want, but you must do something so you can be independent.” At the end, Dad was robbed of his rich voice and his freedom, confined to the ventilator that forced air into his lungs. Francis P. DiChristina died in 1991, after three long years with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. He was 57.

Research has advanced in the past couple of decades since then, and recent findings are providing renewed hope today for patients with Lou Gehrig's disease, as it is commonly known, and for their families. In “Unlocking the Mystery of ALS,” Leonard Petrucelli of the Mayo Clinic and Aaron D. Gitler of the Stanford University School of Medicine describe newly discovered genetic mutations that play key roles in a person's susceptibility to ALS. More exciting yet, it is possible that a technique called “gene silencing” could lead to promising therapeutics.

My father instilled in me admiration for the process of science as a means to increase knowledge. In addition to developments in medical and other applied fields, he revered its ability to demonstrate, for instance, that the stars were not “reflections from the ocean,” as he had once been told by a nun, but fiery powerhouses in a vast cosmos. I like to think he would have enjoyed the new insights offered in this issue's cover story, “The Quantum Multiverse,” by Yasunori Nomura of the University of California, Berkeley. Nomura discusses the fantastic-sounding but now widely accepted view that our universe “may actually be only a tiny part of a much larger structure called the multiverse.” As Nomura explains, some problems with the multiverse idea, which grew out of the theory of cosmic inflation, may be resolved by seeing it as equivalent to a notion from quantum mechanics called the many-worlds interpretation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science may not answer our every question, of course, but it remains humanity's best tool yet for pursuing our greatest challenges. With basic research, we lay down the foundations of understanding. And in doing so, we have the means to continue to build on that underpinning, further lifting our awareness of how the world works. If he were here now, Dad would add emphasis with another of his favorites: “Don't forget,” he would say with a knowing smile and a wink, “your father is always right.”

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 6This article was published with the title “From Science to Knowledge to Hope” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 6 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0617-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe