From the World Economic Forum to the World Library of Science to Superhabitable Worlds

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the January 2015 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As I type this essay on a flight from Dubai to Paris, I can see the hazy curve of our blue planet at the horizon. I've just finished the kickoff meeting of the World Economic Forum's Global Agenda Councils, where I served as vice chair of the Meta-Council on Emerging Technologies. I am now headed to the launch of the UNESCO World Library of Science, a set of free science resources for educators and students created by a partnership of UNESCO and Nature Education, with funding support from Roche. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.) Although they are using different approaches to tackle separate goals, both initiatives share a broader mission: to help improve the state of the world.

I find myself reflecting: Earth is not without its problems, but it's still the most habitable spot in the cosmos. Or is it?

That is the intriguing possibility posed by this issue's cover story, “Better Than Earth,” by René Heller. “Over the past two decades astronomers have found more than 1,800 exoplanets [beyond our solar system], and statistics suggest that our galaxy harbors at least 100 billion more,” Heller writes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some of them may be “superhabitable” worlds—with stable biospheres that may be optimal targets in our search for extraterrestrial life in other corners of the galaxy. They may even surpass the ability to nurture life that we see on Earth, with its vast deserts, frigid polar regions and nutrient-poor open oceans. In our planet's past, it was warmer, wetter and more oxygen-rich than today, and the future will be less life-friendly. Heller's feature story looks at how astronomers are searching for such worlds and what they may be like. 

Back on Earth, you can expect to see our Meta-Council on Emerging Technologies 2015 list in late January, during the World Economic Forum's meeting in Davos. And you don't have to wait at all to dip into the rich knowledge resources in the UNESCO Library of Science: just point your browser to www.unesco.org/wls. A world of possibility awaits.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Many Worlds” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 1 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0115-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe