From What to Whom?

Spencer Heyfron

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The phrase “artificial intelligence,” or AI, seems to be on everybody’s lips these days—along with a lot of questions. After a spurt of development in the 1950s and 1960s, AI languished for a time. Now advances such as machine learning are driving it into multiple fields of human endeavor, from transportation to medicine to finance. But applying AI successfully for all of us means improving it. And one way to do that, writes researcher Alison Gopnik in our cover story, “An AI That Knows the World Like Children Do,” is to teach its networks to learn like a child. The challenge of helping machines develop like youngsters will provide computer scientists with challenges for years—and the rest of us with some societal conundrums. Should we worry? “Natural stupidity can wreak far more havoc than artificial intelligence,” Gopnik writes. Amen.

Elsewhere in the issue, we look at more mysteries of the mind—from why the brain likes lying politicians to how thought is a community effort to new solutions for motor neuron scourges such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease) and Parkinson’s.

As ever, we’d love to hear what you think.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 28 Issue 5This article was published with the title “From What to Whom?” in SA Mind Vol. 28 No. 5 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0917-2

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe