New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Fruity Alternative to Toxic Insect Repellents

A natural compound already used in flavoring keeps flies away from blueberries

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A compound found in fruit could be the safe insect repellent of the future, according to a group of scientists from the University of California, Riverside in the US.

Insects annually destroy huge amounts of agricultural produce. Finding safe and effective repellents is, therefore, a top priority for agrichemical producers. In recent years interest has grown in examining plants’ defences against pests, with one group, for instance, recently investigating how a plant’s chemical distress signal can be converted into a weapon to combat insects.

To find alternatives to existing insecticides, the California team investigated a series of DEET substitutes that are already approved as food additives. DEET is a widely used insect repellent but has been the subject of some safety concerns and is only meant to be applied to skin and clothing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One DEET substitute, butyl anthranilate, is found in fruit and is often used in flavours and fragrances thanks to its pleasant scent. The team found that spraying blueberries with a 10% solution of butyl anthranilate provided nearly total protection for blueberry samples from the spotted wing Drosophila. This fruit fly is a major pest and causes hundreds of millions of dollars of agricultural damage worldwide each year, meaning new ways to fight the flies are urgently needed. 

Senior author Anandasankar Ray has patented the technology and wants to give farmers the option of using naturally-occurring repellents. He is also considering similar approaches to protect humans and animals from insects.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on June 23, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe