New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Fuskushima Radiation May Help Scientists Track Wildlife

Cesium from Fukushima may help scientists track wildlife

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Traces of radiation from Japan's earthquake-damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant are showing up in the muscles of bluefin tuna off California. Although this sounds like bad news, the levels are too low to harm humans or fish but just high enough to help conservation scientists track and protect the overfished species.

Last spring Dan Madigan, a doctoral student at Stanford University, and his colleagues found traces of cesium 137 and cesium 134 in the flesh of bluefin tuna caught off the San Diego coast, which the fish probably picked up by feeding on contaminated plankton and small fish near Japan. They then devised a way of using the half-life of radioactive isotopes to study the fish. Cesium 134 has a half-life of 2.1 years; cesium 137 has a half-life of 30.1 years. The scientists calculated the ratio of the two isotopes in each fish to see if it would reflect how recently the migrants had arrived. (A higher ratio of 134 to 137 would indicate a more recent immigrant.)

The results jibed with what scientists knew about the fish: Pacific bluefin spawn in waters surrounding Japan and spend the first year of their lives foraging there before either staying put or migrating to the California coast to fatten up for mating. Madigan's team found that all fish aged 1.6 years or younger were migrants and that the trip from Japan had taken around two months, which validated their approach. They reported their results in Environmental Science & Technology in March.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new technique shows promise for tracking the movement of other Pacific migratory species, including whales, turtles and sharks. Although cesium 134 levels will soon be too low to be useful, Madigan's team has correlated cesium levels with those of longer-lived stable isotopes such as carbon and nitrogen so that researchers will be able to use them as proxies. “One method is finite, and one is infinite,” Madigan says. “Once you've hammered down the relationship, you can just use the infinite one in the future.”

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Tailing Tuna” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 5 (), p. 27
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0513-27a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe