New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Accident of Evolution Allows Fungi to Thrive in Our Bodies

Cryptococcal fungi have evolved mechanisms for eluding their protist predators, giving them an inadvertent advantage over look-alike immune cells in humans, porpoises and other mammals

Sudden fungal outbreaks have long been routine among plants, and more recently, animals. A recent outbreak among humans in the Pacific Northwest raises the disturbing prospect that we are not immune either. The mystery of this outbreak’s origins is detailed in “Strange Fungi Now Stalk Healthy People” in the December issue of Scientific American.

The outbreak is ongoing but, in spite of appearances, Cryptococcus gattii doesn't exist to plague us. The fungus prefers to live in soil and on trees, where it subsists quite happily on decaying matter. So how can an organism that seems to enjoy a full and rich life on plants and dirt possibly find itself suited to living inside humans? The answer, it turns out, may be an accident of evolution.

Life in the wild is not all sunshine and rotting roses for C. gattii. “Microorganisms are in a constant fight for territory, for food sources, for their place in that microbial community,” says Karen Bartlett of the University of British Columbia, an expert in the behavior of biological aerosols. Yeasts have many predators, and formidable among them are amoebas. These protists ooze their way through the soil and water of the world, engulfing and digesting tiny prey. To prevent amoebic annihilation, Cryptococcus species have evolved mechanisms to elude their would-be predators, such as a drying- and digestion-resistant coat, UV-protective pigments and the ability to survive being swallowed by predators.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Those same mechanisms allow yeast to evade a type of human immune cell that looks and acts just like an amoeba (similar cells are also found in other animals). We call them macrophages. Macrophages, which may share evolutionary roots with free-living amoebas, do virtually the same job in humans that amoebas do in the environment: they crawl around eating things. In our case, those things are bits of junk and microbes, which they ingest and kill with digestive enzymes—just like wild amoebas. “If you didn't know the difference, you'd think that they were amoebas,” Bartlett says.

And apparently, neither does Cryptococcus. In our lungs macrophages scour the surface, mopping up the many foreign objects that land but don’t belong there. In susceptible people and animals Cryptococcus species are just as skillful in duping macrophages as they are their soil attackers. And they use the same methods, at least in the lab.

C. gattii not only can kill macrophages, they can also hide inside them. If ingested, the fungal cells resist digestion while hiding from antibodies, T cells, and other immune system components, effectively converting a macrophage into a microbial Trojan horse. Macrophages travel extensively through the body and can cross the blood–brain barrier. If a yeast cells finds its way from the lung to the brain via a phage or other routes, “that's very bad news,” Bartlett says, “because once it gets into the central nervous system it's in heaven. It has all of the sugars it wants to be able to rapidly proliferate.” When Cryptococcus kills it's generally because such a brain infection has happened.

There are other reasons Cryptococcus has an easy job when it infects us. Unlike the vast majority of fungi, it can survive at 37 degrees Celsius—human body temperature. And it has a tough polysaccharide coat that helps prevent it from drying out in the environment but also helps protect it from macrophages. Finally, its exterior contains melanin, the same pigment that colors human skin, which both protects it from UV radiation as well as inhibits the digestive action of macrophages. “All of these things are protective mechanisms that have allowed it to become established in the environment,” Bartlett says, “and unfortunately those same protective mechanisms make it a pathogen for us.”

Amazingly, this is not an isolated phenomenon. Legionella pneumophila, the bacterial cause of Legionnaires' disease, lives symbiotically inside wild aquatic amoebas and similarly mistakenly infects human macrophages when victims inhale it. Arturo Casadevall, chair of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology and director of the Center for Immunological Sciences at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, who has been studying Cryptococcus for over 20 years, has compared the phenomenon with a card game where soil microbes are playing for survival, but by chance, a few hands confer “accidental virulence” on other hosts.

“Virulence is not their business,” Casadevall says. “Their business is survival. But the same pressures that are allowing them to survive results in traits that gives them capacity to survive in mammals.”

Jennifer Frazer, an AAAS Science Journalism Award–winning science writer, authored The Artful Amoeba blog for Scientific American. She has degrees in biology, plant pathology and science writing.

More by Jennifer Frazer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Accident of Evolution Allows Fungi to Thrive in Our Bodies” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122013-7efMUCQ1nWw7gyIKkoBwFE

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe