New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fungi Make Safer Fireproofing Material

Scientists are now growing mycelium, the fungal root network, into fire-retardant sheets to provide a safer, nontoxic way to protect buildings

Shelf-type mushrooms growing on a tree.

The fireproof material was made from the mycelium of Southern Bracket fungus.

Bob Gibbons/Minden Pictures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In a world where fire threatens more and more homes, scientists have developed a surprising type of material that might keep some buildings safer: wafer-thin sheets of fungi.

Underneath every mushroom is a sprawling, branching network of rootlike structures called a mycelium. Now researchers have successfully grown these networks into Pop Tart–size sheets that could act as a fire retardant in building materials, according to a new study in Polymer Degradation and Stability.

Using a biological material like mycelium has enormous benefits, says senior author Everson Kandare. Unlike asbestos, which is still sometimes added to building materials as a fire retardant, mycelium does not shed noxious compounds when exposed to fire. “When there is a building fire, it [often] isn't the flame intensity or the heat that kills or injures people,” says Kandare, an engineer at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. “It is the fumes and the toxic metal that comes out of building materials.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new mycelium sheets, grown into their unique shape in a plastic container and stacked into protective mats up to a few millimeters thick, could prevent such building materials from burning in the first place. Mycelium contains a lot of carbon. When exposed to fire, the sheet briefly burns, releasing water and carbon dioxide into the air, before petering out and leaving behind a black layer of carbon.

“In order for fire to spread, it has to burn. If you're left with an area you can't burn, then that stops the fire,” says Chris Hobbs, a polymer chemist at Sam Houston State University in Texas, who was not involved in the new study but says he considers the material promising.

Scientists have known about mycelium's flame-retardant properties for several years, but Kandare says this study is the first to incorporate these properties into a useful building material. He suggests mycelium could replace the fire-retardant foam that insulates many commercial buildings, which can produce carbon monoxide and other toxic products when it combusts.

The RMIT team has been reaching out to mushroom farmers to see whether they could scale the technology for commercial use. Kandare is optimistic because mycelium can grow in the dark, which means its energy needs are relatively minimal—and the team fed its prototype with ordinary molasses. Even better, mycelium is a biological material, and any waste it leaves behind is compostable.

“If the product reaches the end of its life, you can just chuck that mycelium in your garden,” Kandare says. “Just toss it in the green beans.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe