New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fungus Cowboys

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The oldest known carnivorous fungus, unearthed in 100-million-year-old amber, apparently lassoed its worm prey with sticky loops. Modern carnivorous fungi are armed with constricting rings and other projections they use to trap prey, but scientists had been unsure of when these snares evolved. Amber from what once was a coastal tropical forest in southwestern France revealed fossilized fungi with their nematode quarry. The carnivores possessed branched filaments adorned with small rings plastered with tiny particles, suggesting that the rings were sticky. Several of the worms were located near rings, and their width roughly matchesthat of the loops, hinting that the nematodes served as prey. Once ensnared, the worms were devoured with infestation filaments, speculate scientists from Humboldt University of Berlin and elsewhere. The scientists suggest that carnivory in fungi is ancient in origin. Digest more in the December 14, 2007, Science.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Fungus Cowboys” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 2 (), p. 29
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0208-29a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe