Galaxy Clusters May Be Main Source of Universe's Gamma Rays

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Scientists discovered the universe's background of gamma rays--the most highly energized form of light known--three decades ago. But the origin of this radiation remains a matter of debate. Some astronomers propose that it emanates from individual quasar-type galaxies, known as blazers, which are powered by supermassive black holes. A second theory posits that galaxy clusters are the source because matter drawn toward them at extremely high speeds can collide with cosmic microwave background light and excite photons to gamma-ray energies. Now new findings, to be published in the Astrophysical Journal, support the contention that galaxy clusters are the bulk source of gamma rays in the universe.

Caleb Scharf of Columbia University and Reshmi Mukherjee of Barnard College analyzed nine years of data collected by NASA's Compton Gamma Ray Observatory. By comparing this information with an inventory of 2,469 galaxy clusters, they determined that the sky surrounding the most massive clusters contains higher quantities of gamma rays than other regions do. "The more massive the cluster, and greater the gravitational potential, the brighter the gamma-ray halo [is]," Mukherjee explains. The brightness they observed, she adds, matches well with predictions from the so-called Loeb-Waxman theory of gamma ray production. Future forays into deep space by observation crafts such as the European Space Agency's INTEGRAL in October and NASA's GLAST in 2006 should help scientists resolve galaxies' gamma-ray haloes in greater detail and shed further light on the origins of these mysterious rays.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American