Gas from Trash

Modified microbes eat waste and secrete fuel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

TODAY THE FACTORIES THAT MAKE GASOLINE, diesel and jet fuel are huge clusters of steel pipes and tanks that consume prodigious amounts of energy, release toxic fumes, and run on an exhaustible resource, petroleum. But tomorrow they might be microscopic, and they might run on the garbage hydrocarbons that are all around us—the paper of this magazine, scrap lumber from a construction project, or the leaves you raked off your lawn last month.

The trick is to transform the hydrogen- and carbon-based molecules inside these everyday items into a liquid at room temperature, thus making them suitable for use in internal-combustion engines. The most promising efforts involve genetically modifying single-celled organisms to do this conversion work for us. Many of these organisms already build hydrocarbons out of raw materials found in the environment, though not in a way that makes the product available for human use. For example, algae are very good at turning carbon dioxide into fatty acids that can be refined into fuel, but getting the algae out of the water and the fatty acids out of the algae requires so much effort that the process is mostly used for pricey products, such as cosmetics.

A better solution would be to create organisms that directly “secrete” the hydrocarbon. (Commercial firms understandably don't like the more accurate, but less pleasant, “excrete.”) With an organism that secretes, “you transform biomass from something you harvest into something that comes from little chemical factories,” says Eric Toone, an Energy Department official in charge of making grants to companies with novel biofuel ideas.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Creating genetically modified fuel factories raises other complications, however. Many people worry about engineered organisms finding their way into the environment; vats of single-celled bugs would be almost impossible to contain.

The organisms must also be kept well fed—the question is with what? One approach is to use sunlight. In September, Joule Unlimited, a biotechnology start-up in Cambridge, Mass., won a patent for a gene-altered bacterium that uses sunlight and carbon dioxide to create components of diesel fuel.

Another strategy is to use sugars. When plants capture energy, they chemically lock up that energy in sugars located in the woody portion of the crop. Many researchers are devising ways to recover the sugars from these “cellulosic sources” and turn them into ethanol, which gets a tax credit but has a lower energy density than gasoline and does not run well in conventional cars at high concentrations.

Instead scientists and engineers hope to make more useful chemicals directly from those sugars. In July scientists at LS9, a company in South San Francisco, said they had modified E. coli bacteria to enable the organisms to convert sugars into alkanes, a class of hydrocarbon that is identical to many of the molecules produced in standard oil refineries. With a few more tweaks to the genome, the fuel in your tank could even come from sugars pried from the scrap heap.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Gas from Trash” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 6 (), p. 52
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1210-52

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe