Gene Activity, Not Sequence, Makes Us Human

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

With all the hoopla over the genome lately, one might expect DNA sequences to finally reveal exactly what it is that makes us human. But findings presented last week at the Human Genome Meeting in Edinburgh, Scotland, suggest that gene activity¿not sequence¿holds the key to our identity.

Comparing three million letters of the chimpanzee genetic code with the human genome draft, Svante P¿¿bo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, and his colleagues found only a 1.3 percent difference between the two. Taking that into consideration, the team concluded that something other than the makeup of the genes themselves must account for what sets us apart from our closest living relatives.

P¿¿bo's group thus turned their attention to levels of gene activity, or transcription. Specifically, they looked at transcription in the brain, liver and blood of humans, chimps and rhesus macaque monkeys. Whereas liver and blood gene activity patterns showed the expected differences among the three groups¿with human transcription looking similar to that of the chimp, and different from that of the more evolutionarily distant macaque¿gene activity in the brain revealed stark differences between humans and chimps. "The [human] brain has accelerated usage of genes," P¿¿bo remarked, according to Nature News Service.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Differences in gene expression may thus explain how largely similar genomes create such different organisms. Still, fully understanding the genetic differences between humans and chimps will require actually getting inside the chimpanzee's mind.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe