Gene Study Explains Chatty Humans, Speechless Apes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Humans share a number of characteristics with the great apes, but a handful of key traits set us apart, our silver tongue among them. In fact, language is believed by some scholars to have been a prerequisite for the development of human culture. Exactly how and when speech evolved in our ancestors has proved difficult to explain, however.

New findings could help unravel that mystery. In a scientific paper published online today by the journal Nature, researchers report having discovered an important difference between the human variant of a language-linked gene known as FOXP2 and the versions found in our great ape kin. Sequencing of the DNA encoding the FOXP2 protein in the chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, rhesus macaque, mouse and human reveal that the human FOXP2 contains unique changes in the DNA's amino acid building blocks. This and other evidence, say study authors Svante P¿¿bo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, and his colleagues, "strongly suggest that this gene has been the target of selection during recent human evolution."

The investigators speculate that the changes evident in human FOXP2 may account for our ability to exert fine control over movements of the mouth and larynx--a talent that the great apes lack. If so, and if, as the team's estimates suggest, the variant became established in the human population during the last 200,000 years of human history--roughly the time at which anatomically modern humans arose--the gift of gab may have been a driving force in their expansion.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe