Gene Therapy Corrects Sickle Cell Disease in Mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Images: ¿SCIENCE

More than four decades after the mutation that causes sickle cell disease was first identified, researchers have finally taken a major step toward treating the blood disorder. According to a report published today in the journal Science, a novel gene therapy method prevents the characteristic deformation, or sickling, of red blood cells in mice.

Sickle cell disease¿which occurs most frequently in people of African, Indian, Middle Eastern and Mediterranean descent¿is an inherited disorder caused by a mutation in the beta globin gene that causes people to manufacture abnormal hemoglobin. As a result, red blood cells, which normally appear doughnut-shaped, take on a sickle-like form that can stick in blood vessels and block blood flow. To address this problem, Robert Pawliuk of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and colleagues created an anti-sickling variant of the beta globin gene that, when introduced to bone marrow via so-called lentiviral vectors, inserts itself into the stem cells that produce red blood cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Their tactic proved highly successful: 10 months after transplantation, up to 99 percent of all red blood cells in the diseased mice expressed the new gene. Sickled cells were thus greatly reduced or eliminated altogether. The images at the right show red blood cells in mice with a model of sickle cell disease that did not receive the anti-sickling gene (top) and those that did receive it (bottom). Furthermore, the gene therapy corrected other problems associated with the disease¿including spleen enlargement and a urine concentration defect.

The results represent a rare success. "Usually when a copy of a new gene lands in the genome this way, it is strongly influenced by its surrounding, and often gets silenced," notes team member Philippe Leboulch, also at MIT. "But when the expression level is very high, and spread evenly through the cells, as it is in the case with lentiviral vectors, the gene can do its work." Still, the researchers have considerable work ahead of them before such a treatment can be evaluated in human clinical trials. Among other things, they hope to find a way to introduce the gene therapy without first irradiating the existing bone marrow

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe