Gene Therapy for Broken Hearts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Abnormal heart rhythms afflict about one in every hundred Americans. For some people, these disturbances are basically harmless. For others, however, being out-of-sync disrupts the heart¿s coordinated pumping and leads rapidly to death. Current treatment options include drug therapy, pacemakers and defibrillators--which cannot cure the condition and have considerable downsides. But if the results of a study published in the December issue of the journal Nature Medicine are any indication, gene therapy may at last offer a long term solution. According to the report, researchers have developed for the first time a gene therapy that settles arrhythmias in pig hearts--the animal hearts that most closely resemble those of humans.

J. Kevin Donahue and his colleagues set out to develop a way to deliver a gene known as an inhibitory G protein gene to one of the heart¿s own pacemakers, a tiny region of tissue called the atrioventricular node (AV). When instructed by the nervous system, this gene acts to slow the heart rate. The team selected a standard gene delivery vehicle, the adenovirus, and then treated 10 pig hearts with agents that enhance uptake of this gene and its viral carrier. They subsequently injected the gene therapy. A week later, tissue studies revealed that the gene had reached nearly half of the AV node. What¿s more, says Donahue, "The AV nodes in the test hearts carried impulses at a significantly slower rate and were far less excitable than those in hearts without the added genes."

The team really put the genetically enhanced hearts to the test when they applied electrical and chemical stimulation that normally produces arrhythmia. Still the animals that had received the G protein gene exhibited a 20 percent decrease in heart rate as compared to control animals. This result is similar to that offered by so-called beta blockers, a common medication, the team notes. "But we believe the gene therapy that ultimately would help humans would, unlike beta blockers, be a long-term solution," Donahue offers. "Also, because gene therapy is localized to a specific place in the heart, it would avoid the side effects that come when beta-blockers travel to other parts of the body."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe