Gene Therapy for Deafness Moves a Few Steps Closer

A technique for fixing faulty DNA has been shown to improve responses in mice with genetic hearing loss

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Ben Hirschler

LONDON (Reuters) - Gene therapy for deafness is moving closer to reality, with new research on Wednesday showing the technique for fixing faulty DNA can improve responses in mice with genetic hearing loss.

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Separately, a clinical trial backed by Novartis is under way to help a different group of people who have lost their hearing through damage or disease.

 

After missteps in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when safety scares set back research, gene therapy is enjoying a renaissance, with positive clinical results recently in conditions ranging from blood diseases to blindness.

 

"We are somewhat late in the auditory field but I think we are getting there now," said Tobias Moser of the University Medical Center Gottingen, Germany, who was not involved in the new research. "It's an exciting time for gene therapy in hearing."

 

A key element in current optimism is the development of better and safer viral delivery systems for getting corrective genes into the body. In the case of deafness, this involves injecting a gene-carrying engineered virus into the inner ear.

 

There are currently no approved disease-modifying treatments for disabling hearing loss, which affects some 360 million people, or 5% of the world's population, according to the World Health Organization.

 

Hearing aids can amplify sounds, while cochlear implants turn sounds into electrical signals for the brain to decode, but such devices cannot fully replicate natural hearing.

 

Much of the hearing loss in older people is noise-induced or age-related, but at least half of deafness that occurs before a baby learns to speak is caused by defects in one of more than 70 individual genes.

 

It is these infants Swiss and U.S. researchers hope to help, after showing that replacing a mutated gene improved the function of hair cells of the inner ear and partially restored hearing in deaf mice.

 

Scientists from the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne and the Boston Children's Hospital, who reported their work in the journal Science Translational Medicine July 8, tested hearing in newborn mutant mice by seeing how high they jumped when startled by a noise.

 

The team focused on a gene called TMC1, which is a common cause of human genetic deafness, accounting for 4 to 8% of cases. But other forms of hereditary deafness could also be fixed using the same strategy.

 

Jeffrey Holt of Boston Children's said the technique still needed "tweaking" but he hopes clinical trials will start within five to 10 years.

 

Work at Novartis is more advanced, with the first patient treated last October in an early-stage clinical trial that will recruit 45 subjects in the United States, with results due in 2017.

 

The Swiss company's product, acquired in a 2010 deal with GenVec worth up to $214 million, delivers a gene called Atoh1 that acts as a master switch for turning on the growth of inner ear hair cells that are central to hearing.

 

Novartis research head Mark Fishman describes it as a "spare parts" approach to fixing ageing-related frailty.

 

The process offers hope to adults whose hair cells have been damaged by excessive noise, disease or exposure to certain drugs, including some antibiotics. But it will not help the one to three babies per 1,000 born with severe genetic hearing loss in both ears.

 

"There are a big range of deafness types needing different approaches," said Moser.

 

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1hX2VyZ

Sci Transl Med 2015.

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe