Gene Therapy for Diabetes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have long sought ways to treat type 1 diabetes, an autoimmune disease that afflicts about three people in every thousand. Standard therapy for these patients, who are unable to produce insulin on their own, focuses on delivering externally produced insulin to the body via injection or external pump. These treatments, in addition to being inconvenient for patients, are unable to adjust blood glucose levels on a minute-to-minute basis, as beta cells do in a healthy individual. But attempts to cure diabetes through transplant or regeneration of insulin-producing cells have failed. Now a novel type of gene therapy described in the November 23 issue of the journal Nature offers hope. According to the report, diabetic mice and rats went into remission five days after receiving the insulin-encoding gene.

Hyun Chul Lee and Su-Jin Kim of Yonsei University in Seoul, Korea and their colleagues turned to genetic engineering to produce an insulin analogue. They then inserted the DNA encoding this analogue into a virus that had been rendered harmless, incorporated the region of the liver cell that responds to glucose, and injected the modified virus into diabetic mice and rats. The animals were subsequently able to produce the insulin analogue in response to changes in their blood-glucose levels throughout the eight month study period.

Whether this approach will work in humans remains to be determined, Jerrold M. Olefsky of the University of California at San Diego writes in a commentary accompanying the report. "Rodents are quite different from humans with respect to maintaining glucose levels," he notes, "and extending these results to human physiology may prove a challenge." Still, that these researchers were able to create a system in which insulin is delivered in response to changing needs, he concludes "is a definite step forward.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe