Gene Therapy for Parkinson's

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some 50,000 Americans each year are diagnosed with the neurodegenerative disease known as Parkinson¿s,in which progressive destruction of so-called dopamine neurons eventually leads to loss of muscle control and function. Recent studies have sought out ways to replace the dopamine neurons or interrupt faulty neural circuitry, but these approaches have been tested only on patients in advanced stages of the disease. Halting disease progression has not yet been achieved. The results of a report published today in the journal Science, however, may offer hope. According to the new findings, gene therapy with a neural growth and repair protein known as GDNF may provide a treatment option.

Earlier research had indicated that GDNF might protect against a loss of dopamine neurons if only it could be delivered to the right neural targets. To that end, Jeffrey H. Kordower of Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke¿s Medical Center and his colleagues created what is known as a lentiviral vector to carry the GDNF. The investigators then injected the vector into the brains of monkeys that were aging and into monkeys in which they had induced neural damage. The treatment salvaged dopamine neuron function in both monkey groups and fought motor degeneration in the neurally damaged monkeys. Moreover, the gene therapy even prompted neural regeneration.

"The Kordower study provides an optimistic outlook for treating not only PD but also other fatal neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis," Lars Olson of the Karolinska Institute wrote in a commentary that accompanied the report. "Before GDNF gene therapy can enter the clinical arena, however, there are a number of hurdles that must be overcome," he cautions. "These include controlling the dose of the GDNF gene and protein, and circumventing the inherent risks associated with gene delivery by viruses."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe