Gene Therapy Offers Hope for Parkinson's Disease

Small trial improves patients' symptoms.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Ewen Callaway

An experimental gene-therapy treatment for Parkinson's disease has eased the movement problems of a small number of patients and raised no major safety concerns. The study, reported in The Lancet Neurology, is the first double-blind clinical trial to show a benefit of gene therapy to patients with the neurodegenerative condition.

Parkinson's disease is characterized by tremors, slowness and cognitive problems, and is caused by the death of neurons in brain circuits that makes dopamine. The effects cascade through interconnected brain regions involved in movement, with some areas becoming overactive.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Many patients are treated with the drug levadopa (L-DOPA), a chemical precursor of dopamine, and regain control of their movements. Over time, however, patients become less sensitive to L-DOPA and burdened by its side effects, which include psychological and physical problems.

Long-term fix

Gene therapy could offer a longer-lasting solution, says Andrew Feigin, a neurologist at the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, New York, who led the trial along with Michael Kaplitt, at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York. This involved 45 patients aged between 30 and 75 years old, and was funded by Neurologix of Fort Lee, New Jersey, which holds the patent for the therapy.

Half of the patients received an infusion of a virus engineered to deliver a gene called glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) into a brain centre that is overactive in Parkinson's disease -- the subthalamic nucleus. GAD encodes a neurotransmitter called GABA, which quiets neurons in this area. Another treatment for Parkinson's, deep brain stimulation (DBS), uses electricity to silence neurons in the same region.

The remaining patients underwent brain surgery, but did not receive the gene therapy.

Six months after these surgeries, Feigin's team measured improvements in both sets of patients using a standardized assessment of Parkinson's disease that looks at factors such as gait, posture, and hand and finger movements. Patients who had received the gene therapy exhibited a 23.1% improvement on this scale, compared with a 12.7% boost for patients who had undergone the placebo surgery. However, patients given the gene therapy did not, as a whole, see any more quality-of-life benefits than the other group.

Feigin's team excluded six patients who may not have received the gene therapy because of problems in its delivery. He says that this is justifiable in a small trial intended to test whether or not a treatment works. "If you included people who didn't get the therapy it could easily wash out the benefit you might see," he says.

In safe hands

One patient who received the gene therapy required treatment for a bowel obstruction 4 months after surgery, but Feigin says this was not related to the therapy.

"I'm very excited to see that it's safe," says Stéphane Palfi, a neurosurgeon at Henri Mondor Hospital in Creteil, France who was not involved in the trial.

However, he notes that DBS typically offers much more benefit to patients with Parkinson's disease. And, he adds, unlike gene therapy, DBS can be tuned up or down depending on a patient's current condition.

Despite this, Palfi remains enthusiastic that gene therapy could provide another tool with which to manage Parkinson's disease. He is involved in an early-stage safety trial for delivering genes involved in making dopamine to the brains of patients with Parkinson's disease. Palfi says that, so far, nine people have received the treatment.

Other scientists are testing gene therapies that prevent neuron from dying in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Marc Panoff, chief financial officer at Neurologix, says that the company will seek permission from the US Food and Drug Administration later this year to conduct a larger clinical trial.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe