A Gene to Better Remember Traumatic Events

Gene variant (found in 30 percent of Caucasian population and 12 percent of African-Americans) leads to more vivid recollections of emotionally powerful episodes—both good and bad

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It's generally accepted both inside and outside psychological circles that the details surrounding emotional events—like scoring the winning touchdown in a football game or a traumatic car accident—are easier to recall than those associated with mundane occurrences.

A new study, appearing in this week's issue of Nature Neuroscience, reports that those who carry a common variant of a gene called ADRA2B may have better recall of emotionally charged moments than those who lack the gene.

"This was a first proof of principle that we are able to identify genes [specifically] related to emotional memory," says the new paper's lead author Dominique de Quervain, a professor in the University of Zurich's Division of Psychiatry Research. "[This work] may have consequences for anxiety disorders where emotional memory plays a critical role."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From laboratory studies, this specific mutation of ADRA2B is known to cause the deletion of three amino acids in the protein that it encodes. This deletion disrupts the behavior of a receptor for the neurotransmitter noradrenaline, which is known to be involved in emotional memory.

According to the study's results, this receptor modification actually improves the recall of emotional memories.

After genotyping 435 young Swiss adults, de Quervain's team presented their subjects with 30 pictures in random order for four seconds each. Each scene fell into one of three emotional arousal categories: neutral (such as a secretary on the phone); positive (a grandfather playing with his grandchildren); or negative (a car accident involving a head wound). After viewing all the pictures, subjects had to write short descriptions of each scene.

Subjects with the gene variant—which is believed to be in 30 percent of the U.S. Caucasian population and 12 percent of African-Americans—could recall up to 80 percent of the emotionally arousing scenes. (Participants without the gene could only remember 40 percent of them.)

"If that deletion variant enhances emotional memories," in the context of an experiment, de Quervain says, "we thought maybe it also enhances very [real] emotional memories". The team then tested 202 refugees from the 1994 Rwandan civil war—133 who had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Among this population, subjects with the gene variant reported (and reexperienced) more distressing wartime memories than those without the variant—regardless of PTSD status.

"Traumatic memory is one of the core features of PTSD," explains de Quervain. "The variant just predisposed to traumatic memory, but not to PTSD."

Going forward, de Quervain said that neuroimaging studies are necessary to determine where exactly the effect on the noradrenaline is taking place in the brain. (Odds are that the amygdala, which is the seat of emotional response to memory, has some involvement.) In addition, the team will continue to look for other genes that may be related to emotional memory. Once more novel genes are discovered, de Quervain says, researchers can begin to test for relevance to anxiety disorders like PTSD.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe