Gene Variant May Hamper Efforts to Kick the Habit

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Giving up cigarettes is notoriously hard to do. Now researchers report that some people carry a gene variant that leaves them especially hard-pressed to kick the habit. The findings appear in a paper published today in the journal Thorax.

The addictive nature of cigarettes stems from nicotine, which is metabolized in the body primarily through an enzyme known as CYP2A6. Previous work has revealed a number of varieties of the gene that encodes this enzyme, CYP2A6. Hidetoshi Nakamura of Keio University in Tokyo and colleagues studied 203 current or former smokers suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a disease for which smoking is a risk factor, as well as 123 healthy, nonsmoking volunteers to determine what type of CYP2A6 they carried. The researchers found that the percentage of people with the D genotype of CYP2A6 was significantly higher among current smokers than it was among ex-smokers. What is more, genotype D was associated with an inability to quit smoking independent of age and lifelong cigarette consumption.

The scientists also note that genotype D appears to function as a protective factor against developing emphysema. "These findings suggest that determination of the genotype will be useful in efficiently withdrawing patients from nicotine dependence," they write, adding that DNA analysis could lead to more effective treatments for patients who are trying to butt out.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American