Genes Expressed in Brain Evolving at a Medium Pace

Even mice brains evolve faster than human brains, and our complexity may be the culprit

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The human brain is not a chimp brain. Sure, somewhere between five million and eight million years ago, before the two species diverged, there was no difference. But at this point, despite our bodies weighing only 20 percent more than those of chimps, the human brain weighs 250 percent more and contains 50 percent more neurons. Eight million years notwithstanding, that would seem to be a sign of rapid change.

But a team of researchers from the University of Chicago, as well as from institutes in Taiwan and Japan, says not so fast, at least with regards to the speed at which the human mind has evolved since its split with the chimpanzee.

"We found that genes expressed in the human brain have in fact slowed down in their evolution, contrary to some earlier reports," states Chung-I Wu, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago and the co-author of a study appearing in the most recent issue of PLoS Biology. "The more complex the brain, it seems, the more difficult it becomes for brain genes to change."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Wu and his colleagues compared the number of substitutions in sequences coding for thousands of genes expressed the brain, liver or muscle within the genomes of mice, macaque monkeys, chimpanzees and humans. What the researchers discovered, unsurprisingly, is that the more sophisticated species had faster rates of overall evolution when compared to less sophisticated species.

However, when the team turned to genes expressed solely in the brain (or in brain tissue as well as other tissues), the trend reversed. Brain-expressed genes in the mouse evolved most quickly; those in humans most slowly.

Wu reasons that when compared to the brains of other animals, the myriad interactions between proteins in the human brain have slowed down its evolution. "We know that proteins with more interacting partners evolve more slowly," explains Wu. "Mutations that disrupt existing interactions aren't tolerated."

Rather than alterations to protein sequences, Wu hypothesizes that it is changes in gene expression that have set humans apart from their chimpanzee cousins. He cites previous reports that found that the number of genes expressed per neuron in the human brain is much greater than that in chimps.

The authors suggest that it is this increased transcription--from genetic sequence to active protein--that is responsible for the higher-order network that leads to the complexity of the human brain.

Stephen Dorus, a biologist at England's University of Bath, notes an important aspect not considered in the study: whether there was rapid evolution of brain genes during primate evolution compared to other mammalian species. " The morphological and cognitive advancement in primates has happened in the last 25 million years not simply since the divergence of chimps and humans," he says. "As such, although these genes may be evolutionarily conserved in recent human evolution, they may have undergone significant evolutionary changes in more ancestral primates."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe