New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Genetic Activity Marks Difference between Brains of Humans and Chimps

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Humans and chimpanzees reportedly share 98.7 percent of the same DNA, but differ greatly in appearance, behavior, and ability. Now scientists may have discovered why this is. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Science, there is more genetic activity in the human brain than there is in the chimpanzee brain. Although there is little difference in the structure of the underlying genes, what they can produce varies substantially, scientists say. The findings suggest that this acceleration of gene expression¿the rate at which a gene generates the messenger RNA and proteins that carry out its orders¿ could be the most significant change to occur during the evolution of humans from simpler primates. The study found that gene expression levels evolved 5.5 times faster in humans than in chimps. The identification of such differences between humans and our closest living relatives, the researchers note, could explain why humans are susceptible to some diseases that chimpanzees can resist.

Svante P¿¿bo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany and colleagues compared the expression levels of genes in tissue and blood samples from humans and several primate relatives: chimpanzees, orangutans and rhesus macaque monkeys. The scientists isolated RNA from each sample and used two techniques to study how this genetic material interacted with a collection of nearly 18,000 human genes. As expected, expression patterns in humans and chimpanzees were similar in the liver and blood samples. Brain tissue, in contrast, showed significant differences among the groups. Expression levels in chimpanzees and other primates remained within the same range, but the human samples registered much more activity. According to the group, these results indicate that the rate of evolutionary change of genetic activity in the brain is more pronounced in humans than in chimpanzees.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The next step, P¿¿bo says, is to isolate the genes that have changed between chimps and humans and to analyze them in greater detail. This could lead to a better understanding of why chimpanzees resist diseases such as AIDS, Alzheimer's, cancer and malaria. With this approach, co-author Ajit Varki of the University of California, San Diego, notes, "we may be able to learn more about the genetics underlying diseases that seem to harm humans but not chimpanzees."

Ask the Experts: How closely related are humans to apes and other animals?

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe