Genetic Analyses Hint at More Hurdles for Antimalarials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite attempts to foil malaria using insecticides and pharmaceuticals, the scourge still infects approximately 300 million people annually and kills as many as 2 million. Now new findings shed further light on why the disease is so hard to control. According to two reports published today in the journal Nature, the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum is older and more genetically diverse than previously thought. Moreover, it develops drug resistance surprisingly quickly.

The precise origin and evolution of P. falciparum is the subject of much debate. To trace the parasite's lineage, Jianbing Mu of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and colleagues looked for genetic differences among five P. falciparum samples hailing from Southeast Asia, Africa, South America, Central America and Papua New Guinea. Specifically, the team examined so-called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 204 genes on chromosome 3 of the parasites. Based on the differences they found, the team estimates that the most recent common ancestor existed between 100, 000 and 180, 000 years ago. This finding is at odds with the theory that the organism went through a population bottleneck less than 5,000 years ago, which would have left today¿s widely dispersed parasites more closely related. Instead, explains study co-author Xin-zhuan Su of NIAID, the researchers "speculate that when the human population grew, the malaria parasite grew with it."

The second report investigated the parasite's response to a widely used antimalarial drug, chloroquine. Chloroquine-resistant strains of malarial have existed for more than four decades but how this invulnerability arose and its impact on other strains of the parasite remains difficult to assess. John C. Wootton of the National Institutes of Health and his colleagues found that the gene responsible for this resistance, dubbed pfcrt, is in fact widely distributed in parasites from around the world. Using 87 parasite samples from geographically distant patients, the scientists determined that there were at least four distinct resistance-conferring events. In addition, they report that pfcrt moved across continents very quickly, requiring less than 80 generations (between six to 30 years) to become established. The results highlight the need for careful drug-use monitoring programs in current and future attempts to curtail the disease. Notes Su, a member of both research teams, "this means that when a drug- or vaccine-resistant parasite arises, it will not take long for this resistance to spread to other continents, reflecting human travel, particularly by air, and the high transmission rate via mosquitoes in Africa."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe